Optimizing Ecological Insights: A Comparative Study of Analytical and Numerical Approaches for Time-Fractional Fisher-KPP Equations
Keywords:
Caputo derivative, Fisher–KPP equation, Adomian decomposition, homotopy analysis, finite difference, Time-fractional Fisher–KPP equation, finite volume method, ecological modeling, anomalous diffusion.Abstract
Fractional reaction-diffusion equations provide a robust mathematical framework for modeling anomalous diffusion processes frequently encountered in ecological contexts. This paper presents a systematic comparative evaluation of four distinct solution methodologies for the time-fractional Fisher-Kolmogorov-Petrovsky-Piskunov equation: the Adomian Decomposition Method (ADM), the Homotopy Analysis Method (HAM), an L1-approximation finite-difference scheme (FD-L1), and a novel L1-discretization finite-volume scheme (FV-L1). The memory effects associated with sub-diffusive dispersal processes in fragmented habitats are effectively represented by the fractional derivative, computed using the Caputo formulation. Numerical experiments demonstrate that, while both ADM and HAM yield accurate analytical approximations in the short term, the FV-L1 scheme exhibits significantly enhanced long-term stability. It ensures mass preservation, a critical characteristic for isolated ecological systems. In contrast, the computationally efficient FD-L1 method experiences an artificial mass loss exceeding 2% over extended time intervals. Consequently, the findings advocate for the adoption of finite-volume discretization as the optimal approach for examining ecological conservation-related modeling, particularly in relation to invasion dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. This study addresses the knowledge gap between the theoretical foundations of fractional calculus and practical ecological predictions, providing a framework for researchers seeking to explore memory-dependent biological phenomena.
References
[1] R. A. FISHER, “THE WAVE OF ADVANCE OF ADVANTAGEOUS GENES,” Annals of Eugenics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 355–369, Jun. 1937, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1937.tb02153.x.
[2] Loubna Salhi, Mofdi El-Amrani, and M. Seaid, “Analysis of a Galerkin-characteristic finite element method for convection-diffusion problems in porous media,” Advances in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 12, no. Special, pp. 96–122, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.21494/iste.op.2021.0700.
[3] R. Metzler and J. Klafter, “The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach,” Physics Reports, vol. 339, no. 1, pp. 1–77, Dec. 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3.
[4] S. Dutta and S. K. Roy, “Phase transitions in two planar lattice models and topological defects: A Monte Carlo study,” Physical Review E, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 066125–066125, Dec. 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.70.066125.
[5] Igor Podlubny, Fractional differential equations an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications. Milton Keynes Lightning Source Uk, 2009.
[6] V. V. Gafiychuk, B. Datsko, and V. Meleshko, “Mathematical modeling of time fractional reaction–diffusion systems,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 220, no. 1–2, pp. 215–225, Oct. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2007.08.011.
[7] P. Rahimkhani, “Numerical solution of nonlinear stochastic differential equations with fractional Brownian motion using fractional-order Genocchi deep neural networks,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 126, p. 107466, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107466.
[8] Yury Luchko, “BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS FOR THE GENERALIZED TIME-FRACTIONAL DIFFUSION EQUATION OF DISTRIBUTED ORDER,” Jan. 2009.
[9] G. Adomian, Solving Frontier Problems of Physics: The Decomposition Method. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
[10] S. Liao, Advances in the Homotopy Analysis Method. World Scientific, 2013.
[11] Z. Sun and X. Wu, “A fully discrete difference scheme for a diffusion-wave system,” Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 193–209, Feb. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2005.03.003.
[12] B. I. Henry, T. A. M. Langlands, and S. L. Wearne, “Fractional Cable Models for Spiny Neuronal Dendrites,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 12, Mar. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.128103.
[13] L. Zhang, L. Wang, and X. Ding, “Exact finite-difference scheme and nonstandard finite-difference scheme for coupled Burgers equation,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2014, no. 1, p. 122, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2014-122.
[14] A. Osman, “3D modelling using partial differential equations (PDEs),” SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University), Jan. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.28026.75204.
[15] K. Diethelm, The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations. Springer, 2010.
[16] A. Osman, “Efficient 3D Surface Patch Compression and Reconstruction using Parametric Descriptions and Transform Techniques,” Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 107–116, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.51984/jopas.v22i1.2164.
[17] Safaa Alhodairy and Abdusslam Beitalmal, “The Applications of Fourier Series Harmonics in Musical Tones,” Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 154–161, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.51984/jopas.v23i2.3590.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdusslam Osman Beitalmal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by: